<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.standandvoice.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.standandvoice.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:35:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Current State of the Auto Business</title>
		<link>http://www.standandvoice.org/hello-world.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.standandvoice.org/hello-world.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standandvoice.org/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Year gives rise to reflection on the past months of 2008 as well as a look forward into 2009. We are living in historic times and sailing uncharted waters. The following is a look at where we&#8217;ve been and where we might be going. By late summer 2008 the auto business was already [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Year gives rise to reflection on the past months of 2008 as  well as a look forward into 2009. We are living in historic times and  sailing uncharted waters. The following is a look at where we&#8217;ve been  and where we might be going.</p>
<p>By late summer 2008 the auto business  was already in trouble with high fuel prices destroying volume, product  mix, and resale values. Overnight, consumers and their banks found  themselves thousands of dollars upside down, whether they were leases or  long term finance contracts. Lenders, already running scared because of  increasing delinquencies and defaults, experienced horrendous residual  losses in their off lease portfolios. GAP insurance providers became  nervous.</p>
<p>Further, the housing and mortgage meltdown, which began  in 2007, was building steam. Few knew the width and depth of mortgage  securitization exposure and its possible effect on the financial sector.  Who knew that speculation, primarily in the 4 states of CA, AZ, NV, and  FL, and fundamental flaws in Fannie and Freddie&#8217;s risk management could  wreak such havoc? In my oversimplified view, the meltdown resulted from  the perverse alignments of conservatives&#8217; desire to minimize regulation  and the liberals&#8217; desire for everyone to be able to own a home. On  September 7, it was announced that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were being  placed into government conservatorship. They have since be re-juiced  with billions of federal dollars and given a new mandate. Detailed notes  of the Congressional hearings regarding Fannie and Freddie can by  received by emailing the author at <a href="mailto:ruggles@msn.com">ruggles@msn.com</a> Use subject line &#8220;Request Notes&#8221;<br />
For a detailed synopsis of how mathematical risk modeling led to the  financial system meltdown Google &#8220;A Mountain, Overlooked, How Risk  Models Failed Wall St. and Washington, By James G. Rickards</p>
<p>On  September 15 Lehman Brothers declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the largest  in U.S. history. Surprisingly, the government didn&#8217;t bail them out. The  markets asked, &#8220;If Lehman can go, who&#8217;s next?&#8221; The government then  announced a bailout of AIG, the largest bailout in history. Panic was  setting in. September 2008 will go down as one of the darkest months in  our economic history and it didn&#8217;t get much better from there. In  October we had a brief suspension in the presidential campaign so the  Congress could focus on an economic bailout plan named T.A.R.P. for  Troubled Asset Relief Program. Its author, Hank Paulson, started off  with some credibility. By the time Congress got finished with the bill  we all had more reason to revile our elected officials as they added in  billions for their special interests. Later on, Paulsen and his people  lost all credibility when it was revealed that the money wasn&#8217;t used for  the purpose stated when we were all sold the program. Then we learned  about AIG executives going off on an expensive retreat on what was  viewed as taxpayer money and banks who couldn&#8217;t or wouldn&#8217;t answer  questions about what they had done with their share of the T.A.R.P.  money. We learned new terms like &#8220;credit default swap&#8221;, &#8220;risk modeling&#8221;,  and &#8220;tranche&#8221;. Googling &#8220;The Perfect Machine&#8221; will allow you to view  the rather lengthy story of AIG as published in the Washington Post. Its  a great read and very informative!</p>
<p>In July, Wall Street pressured  Chrysler Credit into giving up leasing as part of a refinancing deal.  This was not commonly known at the time. Once this was announced  independent banks figured if Chrysler wouldn&#8217;t stand behind their own  vehicles, why should we? What do they know that we don&#8217;t? The banking  climate was already uncertain enough. Lenders bailed out of leasing one  after another. Predicting residuals turned out to be a most inexact  science if one could not predict fuel prices. Lessors took major baths  on luxury models and &#8220;heavies.&#8221; A few OEM captives stayed in leasing but  they were either German or Japanese brands. The German luxury brands in  particular rely on leasing for a major portion of their volume.  Unfortunately, there are rumors of MANY off lease vehicles stored in  marshalling yards around the country. Ford stayed in leasing on a very  limited basis.</p>
<p>U. S. Bank stands alone as the only bank with  national scope that has stayed in new vehicle leasing. Even they  abandoned pre-owned leasing leaving only the programs of certain OEMs  for those who want to lease pre-owned vehicles. A few regional banks and  credit unions have stayed in as well but have backed off of their  residuals. Yet, EVERYONE agrees that after a period of time with a low  SAAR (Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate) we will experience an extreme  used vehicle shortage at some point down the road.</p>
<p>We saw the CEOs  of the &#8220;Big 3 come to Washington in private jets with their hands out  only to get spanked, lectured, and told to come back in two weeks using a  different means of conveyance and with a plan. I stubbornly insist on  referring to them as the Big 3 even though they aren&#8217;t any more. Perhaps  I should call them the Detroit 3. The hearings played out on  television. The country became familiar with both old and new players  like Bob Nardelli from Chrysler, Barney Frank, D-MA, and Bob Corker  R-TN. After much theatrics Congress failed to act, divided on mostly  party lines on UAW labor cost issues. The Bush administration stepped in  at the last minute to prevent GM and Chrysler from going bankrupt with a  cash infusion from T.A.R.P. funds. In the meantime, T.A.R.P. had ended  up not being used for its intended purpose anyway. Since the initial  T.A.R.P. funds were not used to buy up mortgage securities, no one  seemed to know what the mortgage securities were worth. Fear of both the  known and the unknown caused the credit markets to seize up. In the  auto business, consumers with credit scores above 700 or below 580 could  probably get credit, although the low credit scores were almost  exclusively BHPH (Buy Here, Pay Here) transactions. Those in between  were largely out of luck unless they had a credit union or a special  circumstance they could call on. Negative equity? Forget about getting  it financed!</p>
<p>Ford&#8217;s CEO Alan Mullaly came to Washington with his  two Detroit competitors but stated his company&#8217;s situation was not so  dire as to need an immediate &#8220;bailout.&#8221; Ford had raised a lot of cash  early on before the credit market dried up. Instead they asked to be  considered for a line of credit in the case the economy stayed in  recession longer than their cash cushion could last. It makes one wonder  if someone in the Ford family might have seen the potential for a  situation to arise where the company would have to go to the government  for help. One wonders what might happen to the Ford family&#8217;s special  category of voting stock in the case of taxpayer money being injected  into the company. Ford hopes to benefit from favorable PR as the only  U.S. OEM to not need taxpayer money. They are also banking on being able  to bring small vehicles to the U.S. from Europe if needed. In addition,  they have some new technology almost ready for release that allows them  to extract larger engine power from small displacement engines using  direct injection and twin turbochargers. They stand to benefit from any  concessions the UAW negotiates with their competitors.</p>
<p>Having said  all of this, the American buying public has short memories. With the  price of fuel around $1.60, hybrid and small vehicle sales have dropped  remarkably. Toyota recently announced a 45% drop in Prius hybrid sales.  This gives residual value prognosticators even more heartburn. Let&#8217;s  face it, if gasoline stays this cheap Americans absolutely will not pay  extra for advanced fuel economy. It&#8217;s been proven time and again. Bob  Lutz of GM has weighed in on the subject. Accessing the link will  reference his comments made to Ward&#8217;s Auto World. Keep in mind that Lee  Iacocca pitched a 25 cent gasoline tax in the early eighties. To say  that industry leaders are mixed on this issue would be an  understatement. Energy policy is an issue that goes beyond the auto  industry as it is truly an issue of national security. Also at issue is  the value of the dollar and our country&#8217;s balance of payments based on  the extreme outflow of dollars to pay for foreign oil. Google &#8220;Bob Lutz  in Wards Auto World&#8221; for this very important article.</p>
<p>Detroit was  accused by some Washington lawmakers and media pundits, of building cars  no one wanted to buy. Yet the sales slump hit South Detroit and imports  alike. Even Lexus was down over 40% and has inventory stacked up at the  port. Toyota idled their Tundra plant in San Antonio for 3 months and  suspended plans for a new hybrid plant in Mississippi. They ran the  first quarter of red ink in company history.</p>
<p>Despite the fact that  the Detroit 3&#8242;s market share has been steadily eroding they still build  a lot of vehicles and employ a lot of people. They are also responsible  for the payment of a lot of taxes as are their dealers in their  individual markets. South Detroit got their &#8220;bailouts&#8221; up front in the  form of incentives and tax subsidies from the southern states where they  located in the first place. This is not to defend the stupid moves made  by the decision makers at the Detroit 3, but most of those decisions  are the subject for a subsequent report. In my view, the government has  some responsibility for what has happened. It&#8217;s not the Big 3&#8242;s fault  that we have no comprehensive energy policy in this country as do other  developed nations. It&#8217;s also not their fault that the government&#8217;s role  in the housing and mortgage market through the debacles at Fannie and  Freddie caused the financial markets to seize up and prevented the Big 3  from being able to go through normal financing channels to &#8220;bridge&#8221;  themselves.</p>
<p>Through all of this the economy lost millions of jobs.  The stock market continued its slide from earlier in the year. Its  roller coaster nature during the dark days of September and October left  many of us with a feeling of nausea. The auto industry SAAR slowed to a  below 11 million. Many auto dealers were left by the roadside, with  more to fail in the coming months. The T.A.R.P. finds that were released  to the big banks allowed them to gobble up small banks who were in  trouble and would probably have gone bust. Even though this didn&#8217;t do  anything to firm up the value of the so called &#8220;toxic assets&#8221; it did  serve the function of keeping the small banks from closing without the  Feds having to micromanage each situation. It was thought that even  small bank failures could potentially cause a run on many banks. But the  taxpaying public felt betrayed. In late November CitiBank received a  300 billion plus commitment from the Feds that was over and above the  T.A.R.P. In the middle of all this, we elected a new President largely  based on hope for the future.</p>
<p>So where are we now? The Detroit 3  have been &#8220;bridged&#8221; with the prospect of additional financing looking  good under the incoming administration. GMAC/Cerberus has received a  change in banking status to qualify for government funds. This is a  MAJOR deal as they desperately need cheap money to lend to support their  dealer&#8217;s sales efforts.<br />
<a href="http://www.websan.com/">online accounting software</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.standandvoice.org/hello-world.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

